Casper Ruud vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Mar at 04:27 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ruud vs M. Kecmanovic

NOR
4
Win
Played
3
Win

SRB
4
Win
Played
3
Win
Head-to-head: Ruud 4 - 3 Kecmanovic
They have played 16 sets in total, with Casper Ruud winning 9 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 7. The last match between Casper Ruud and Miomir Kecmanovic was at the Miami Open - Miami, 21-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Casper Ruud getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ruud | 4 |
| Kecmanovic | 3 |
Last 7 H2H Matches:
(R2) Miami Open - Miami(03-21-25)
(R2) Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-10-24)
(R2) Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(04-27-24)
C. Ruud vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,753,225 | Career Prize Money | $5,218,780 |
| 65.02% (448-241) | Career Total W/L | 55.98% (323-254) |
| 3 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 17 | Titles | 7 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 3 |
| 70.91% (39-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.15% (24-28) |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
C. Ruud vs M. Kecmanovic Match Preview:
When it comes to the art of second serves, both Ruud and Kecmanovic could probably write a novel with those fine margins! Over the past six months, Ruud has managed to win 45.97% of points on his second serve. Kecmanovic, not wanting to be left in the dust, slightly edges him out with 46.04%. Apparently, second serves are as tricky as unraveling a Sherlock Holmes mystery—but they sure help predict match outcomes with surprising accuracy!
As for the return game, Ruud has been snapping up 43.88% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Kecmanovic likes to one-up him with a snuggly 48.11%. But when it comes to the mysterious first serve returns, Ruud pockets 24.49% while Kecmanovic settles for 21.72%. These stats, much like my attempts at making breakfast, are often crucial in determining who’s expected to lead the dance on the court.
Cracking under pressure? Not in Ruud’s dictionary, who’s saved 54.84% of breakpoints recently. Kecmanovic, albeit a close second with 53.45%, may just need a bit more yoga under pressure. In the last year, Ruud has become a road warrior with a 65.22% match win rate (W/L 45/24), while Kecmanovic's 51.61% (W/L 32/30) suggests he’s perhaps a bit better at hosting a tennis tea party than defending his baseline.
Taking a detour to surface preferences, both players have hung a “Home Sweet Home” sign on clay courts. Ruud's clay mastery is seen in his remarkable 70% win rate. However, grass seems to be Ruud’s kryptonite with just a 38% success rate. Kecmanovic, on the other hand, might serenade clay courts with a 61% win rate, and while not exactly feeling grass under his toes, he fares slightly better with a 46% record on it.
When bashing rackets on the Main tour over the past year, Ruud seems to be the cool cat, winning 73.08% of his matches. Kecmanovic's 50% win ratio here seems to paint a picture of him contemplating life decisions as much as perfecting his serve. But who are we, mere mortals, to judge the level of competition they each face with average opponent ranks at 58.57 for Ruud and 76.24 for Kecmanovic?
In the spheres of head-to-head battles, they've crossed beefy rackets five times, with Ruud catching the bouquet in three of those matches. Though the last tango in Rome in May 2024 saw Kecmanovic crafting a script of comeback plans, clinching a dramatic victory with a swift wave of his tennis wand 0-6, 6-4, 6-4. With the match-time average being around 1:22:51, you could drop your laundry at the dry cleaner's and pick it back up by match end.
If things go into overdrive, Kecmanovic might have better luck with deciding sets, having won the only decisive occasion they've shared. However, Ruud has a whopping 71% success rate in such sets over the last year, making him the Duke of Deciders. In tiebreaks, Ruud grins with a 1-0 record against Kecmanovic, so he’s had his share of thrilling finishes as well.
Finally, we pull out our crystal ball and see the breakpoint conversations drama unfolding. Ruud, in the heat of the moment, converts 28.41% of his breakpoint chances, while Kecmanovic sits pretty at 29.58%. With all these juicy stats laid out like a chartbuster album, the favor inevitably points towards Ruud winning this upcoming clash, unless of course, Kecmanovic has one of those ‘muse struck’ days on the court—keep your tomatoes ready! But placing your bets on the structured Ruud seems to be the safe and entertaining choice!
Casper Ruud vs Miomir Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ruud vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 9 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 76 | Games Won | 60 |
| 39 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:27:52 | Average Match Time | 1:27:52 |
| 63% (272/431) | 1st Serve % | 61% (238/390) |
| 72% (197/272) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (170/238) |
| 52% (83/159) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (67/152) |
| 53% (20/38) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (13/43) |
| 39% (153/390) | Return Points Win % | 35% (151/431) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (3/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 25% (1/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (1/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Ruud Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(1) ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
F | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
M. Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) | ||

C. Ruud vs M. Kecmanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.02% (448/241) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.98% (323/254) |
| 61.23% (1047/663) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.49% (776/648) |
| 54.23% (8899/7512) | Games Win/Loss | 51.95% (7111/6576) |
| 60.20% (118/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.18% (141/110) |
| 69.72% (251/109) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.19% (124/82) |
| 61.67% (74/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (40/40) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2992 | Aces Total | 2116 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1482 | Total Double Faults | 1159 |
| 1:40:36 | Average Match Time | 1:40:57 |
| 327.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.07 |
| 65% (31257/48074) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25015/41358) |
| 71% (22335/31257) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17551/25015) |
| 53% (8997/16817) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8654/16338) |
| 41% (1853/4486) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1595/3907) |
| 38% (18230/47990) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16156/42193) |
| 65.96% (62/32) | Slam W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 60.29% (82/54) | Masters W/L | 40.22% (37/55) |
| 77.14% (27/8) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 67.12% (147/72) | Main Tour W/L | 54.09% (119/101) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.69% (60/44) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (58/35) |
| 71.43% (60/24) | Futures W/L | 72.63% (69/26) |
| 66% (391/594) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (288/512) |
| 61% (54/88) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 52% (129/250) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (115/248) |
| 60% (123/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (92/184) |
| 90% (427/384) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (342/277) |
| 10% (427/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (342/65) |
| 25% (262/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (235/46) |